Prioritizing Risk Treatments on a Given Subterranean Oil Pipeline Project Using Fuzzy Decision Making Technique

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Industrial Engineering, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Industrial Engineering, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Following dangers limitation strategies to reduce incidence possibility, intensity traces, and increase assessment capability happens in oil and gas industries have kept on focus by managers. The scope of this project is choosing the most suitable cases which reduce expenses of risks in Ilam-Ahvaz transmit pipe line reparation project. Firstly, by using the three-point Delphi method, these were recognized the most criticism dangers, and then with the help of smarts’ ideas, several choices were identified against them, and finally based on fuzzy TOPSIS method, many preference strategies were introduced. Research results show that “preparation of article and equipment by go-betweens for risk prohibition”, “installation control valves for earthquake risk”, “quarrel resolve group prediction at the start of the agreement for deferment risk to resolve opponent pension cases”, “payment credit security of external stuff to change the amount of payment”, “amendment written safety recipes at the start of the project to explore and fire risks”, “ forecast for torrent and water eclipse”, are the most important policies that following them can cause noticeable reduction in crisis dangers.

Keywords

References

Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K (1981), “Multi attribute decision making methods and applications: a state-of-the-art survey”, Berlin, Springer.
Chen, S. J., & Hwang, C.L (1992), “Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making methods and applications”, Berlin; New York: Springer-Verlage.
Zeleny, M., (1992), “Multiple   Criteria Decision Making”, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Ben, D., & Raz, T (2001), “An integrated approach for risk response development in project planning”, The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 52(1), pp. 14-25.
Kujawski, E (2002), “Selecting of technical risk responses for efficient contingencies”, Journal of Systems Engineering, 5(3), pp. 194-212.
Yeh, C.H, & Deng, H (2004), “A practical approach to fuzzy utilities comparison in fuzzy multi-criteria Analysis”, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 35 (2), pp. 179-194.
Project Management Association (2005), “Book of project management body of knowledge”, version 2000-  translators: Seied Hosein Osouli, Ali Bayat, Hosein Naseri, Ali Afkhami- Publishing Petrochemical company industries, Research and development of project management, first print(In Persian).
Wang, T. C., & Chang, T. H (2007), “Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial aircraft under a fuzzy environment”, Expert Systems with Applications, 33(11), 870-880.
Fan, M., Lin, N., and Sheu, C (2008), “Choosing a project risk-handling strategy: An analytical model”, International Journal of Production Economic, 112(2), pp. 700-713.
Mubin, S., & Mubin, G (2008), “Risk analysis for construction and operation for gas pipeline projects in Pakistan”, Pakistan Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, Vol. 2, pp. 22-37.
Project Management Institute MI. (2008), “A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (4ed.)”, USA: Project Management Institute Inc.
Smih, O., Selin, S., & Elif, I (2009), “Long term supplier selection using a combined fuzzy MCDM approach: A case Study for a telecommunication company”, Journal of Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 36(2), pp. 3887-3895.
Wang, H., & Hsu, F (2009), “An integrated operation module for individual risk management”, European Journal of Operational Research, 198(2), pp. 610-617.
Derri, B., & Hamzei.A (2010), “Strategy appointment of risk reply in manager by ANP technic (case study: oil square development of Azadegan north”, Industrial management, second course, number 4, 75-92(In Persian).
Mirzai Chaboki, Mohsen (2009), “ Strategy edition for Chooka company and strategies ranking with phase Topsis technic”, Nourbakhsh, Seied Kamran, MSc thesis of Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Unit, management college(In Persian).
 
Shahriari, A., Sadigh, R., & Tesfamariam S (2010), “Risk analysis for oil & gas pipelines: a sustainability assessment approach using fuzzy based bow-tie analysis”, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. 25, pp. 505-523.
Ganguly, K., and Guin, K. K., (2013), “A fuzzy AHP approach for inbound supply risk assessment”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 20.
International Journal of Resistive Economics
Volume 5, Issue 1 - Serial Number 8
January 2017
Pages 17-33

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 24 June 2016
  • Revise Date: 01 October 2016
  • Accept Date: 25 November 2016

Share

How to cite

Statistics